Q: Does the new Hyde Park Local Law mean that the Six Senses project is ready to go before the Planning Board in Clinton?
Unless and until the Hyde Park Town Board approves IHG’s application for the proposed access roads through the Greenbelt after a Public Hearing (and then only if no one appeals), the resort still lacks road access and the project should not go before the Clinton Planning Board. According to the Clinton Zoning Board of Appeals, Six Senses must be able to show that they (1) have the required road access and (2) that their right to road access is “unappealable.” Right now, the Hyde Park Town Board has not yet granted road access and any decision (and the law itself) can be appealed. While even many Clinton officials seem confused about this, these are the facts: that’s the way Hyde Park wrote its law and it’s what the Clinton ZBA required.
OCT 2026 UPDATE: The Clinton Planning Board was petitioned by IHG/Six Senses/CECNY to continue Planning Board activities despite the pending lawsuit and Hyde Park not having formally granted road access. The Planning Board in turn requested the Zoning Board of Appeals rule on whether the developer had met the criteria of unappealable road access. The ZBA, despite being an independent body, applied the Clinton Town Board’s Stipulation Agreement to settle a lawsuit with Six Senses (instead of standing up to a bully), the ZBA ruled that the conditions of their June 2024 ruling must be considered met, and the Planning Board activities could continue.
Q: Can’t the Town of Clinton Planning Board set event and guest limits on the IHG Six Senses resort?
The Planning Board can attempt to set event and guest limits to regulate its operation, but based on the wording of the law, such limits must be based on, “the size and occupancy capacity of buildings and structures that will be used for events, the proximity of buildings and structures to adjoining residences, the size and location of parking facilities, the potential for noise or other disruptions to the neighborhood, and the safety of all persons”. So in reality, the Planning Board has little say over capacity and event numbers, only on the size and number of structures and event spaces which then drive capacity. Its volunteer members will come under enormous pressure from IHG, which has deep pockets, aggressive lawyers and consultants and a proven willingness to bully and file lawsuits whenever it doesn’t get its own way. They know that lawsuits frighten small towns and wear down their resistance. It is highly likely that, if the Planning Board sets reasonable limits to disruption to the town, its residents, and the environment by development and operation of the Six Senses resort, IHG Six Senses will sue the Planning Board and the Town. This will likely continue into the future, as the resort looks to expand their operation.
When this happens, it will be crucial for town residents to loudly support the Planning Board members in setting strict limits that require IHG to operate this within the law as a conference center and not as the large resort hotel which they are clearly planning on. Without corrected zoning law to place guardrails on such development, the town will continually need to fund expensive environmental and land-use consultants to contest the inevitably biased findings of the developer’s paid consultants, which will be even more ongoing costs to the town.
Q: Since hotels, spas, retail shops, bars, restaurants and other commercial services are not allowed where Six Senses wants to build, how can they offer these features?
IHG’s position seems to be that, while those commercial establishments would not be allowed in this zoning district on their own, they are allowed when they are part of a permitted “conference center.” It will be up to the Planning Board to determine whether those services are permitted under whatever Special Use Permit they issue, and it is up to Town of Clinton residents to make Planning Board (and Town Board) members understand that our agricultural/residential districts are NOT the place for such commercial services. As referenced in the previous question, the Planning Board will invariably be repeatedly sued into submission by the developer.
Q: How will the Town of Clinton monitor that the resort hotel is operating as a “conference center,” as required by the current law, and abiding by any limitations imposed by the Planning Board?
Six Senses intends, according to their own filings, to hold multiple events every single day of the year. Given this immense volume of “events,” the Town would likely have to employ additional paid (i.e., taxpayer-funded) staff members to coordinate and monitor compliance with the property’s Special Use Permit. If the Town Board is unable or unwilling to budget for these additional costs, the Town would simply forego the coordination and monitoring required under Special Use permitting, leaving Six Senses free to operate as a large resort hotel, free of any meaningful Town oversight or enforcement. If the Town of Clinton does attempt to enforce any reasonable restrictions, it is highly likely the Town will find itself again as a Defendant in an expensive lawsuit in which IHG argues that the Town’s restrictions are undue interference with its “business operations,” are illegal, and should be struck down.
Under the Town’s current Conference Center Law, renewal of Special Use Permits is essentially guaranteed, except when the permittee has current, actual violations on the record as of the date they file for renewal. So once the Special Use Permit is granted, the resort is probably free to operate forever, or sell the property with the permit to another hotel chain.
Q: Can’t the Clinton Town Board simply retract the Conference Center Law or impose a Moratorium to allow time to change it?
The Town Board agreed the Conference Center Law is not in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan (as required by NY State law) and needs to be fixed (see the well-reasoned
analysis). The Clinton Town Board created a non-standard Moratorium, by exempting any projects with a pending application.
In fact
New York State’s Moratoria Law was written for
exactly this reason. It recognizes that towns sometimes need to update zoning laws to be made bulletproof and consistent with their Comprehensive Plans. Moratoria can and
ARE traditionally instituted on
both pending/in-progress and future development applications. An effective moratorium, putting in-progress and newly received applications
ON HOLD while the town repeals or fixes the law, would be legal and would be
very likely to hold up in court (when IHG sues the town, as it inevitably will).
It is common for towns to change or repeal their laws when it becomes clear that the current laws do not align with their comprehensive plans and with residents’ wishes. Property developers know that they assume this risk whenever they make development plans, and will often acquire permits prior to purchase. The law is very clear that NO property owner has additional rights just because they file an application.
UPDATE: The Clinton Town Board created and passed a purposely toothless Moratorium in August 2025. Instead of pausing projects not yet approved and permitted, the Town Board unanimously voted FOR a moratorium that made EXCEPTIONS for Conference Center Applications already submitted (e.g. Six Senses). Should this Town Board and its legal counsel continue to be in power when a new law is passed, one can certainly predict the same EXCEPTIONS will be made for the Six Senses resort hotel and spa.
Q: I support the town’s recent restrictions on AirB&B, because I worry about how short-term rentals may impact noise and traffic in our quiet rural community. Now it looks like a global hotel chain is being allowed to develop a huge commercial resort, even though hotels are not allowed outside of the hamlets by the town zoning law and Comprehensive Plan. How does this make sense?
We agree! What’s the sense of restricting individual short-term rentals, agricultural event venues, and hotels and other lodging while allowing a huge 240-guest resort and spa development at the same time? Unless the Conference Center Law is modified or repealed, it seems clear that a global corporation is getting special treatment while residents are getting shortchanged. Remember, there are NO benefits to local residents from this resort.
Q: Isn’t opposition to the resort really just a bunch of neighbors who don’t want to live near the resort (NIMBY)?
No. In order to establish legal standing to challenge the project, close and adjacent property must raise legal issues. But, CSHV consists of many hundreds of people from throughout Clinton, Hyde Park, Rhinebeck, and beyond because this project threatens more than just the immediately adjacent area. Traffic, noise, environmental impacts, increased flooding risks, and more that extend well beyond the immediate area.
The ways in which the towns of Clinton and Hyde Park have enabled IHG to evade town zoning codes also directly threatens the rule of law. Every area resident and business must comply with local zoning laws, so IHG should be required to follow them too. There should not be an exemption for global multi-billion-dollar corporations.